KARTHIK vs SUSHILA — 52/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS210003762026

Filing Number

56/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

52/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARTHIK

    Adv. KIRAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHILA

  2. 2.SANTHOSHA S

  3. 3.SHWETHA

  4. 4.ETHIKSHA

  5. 5.PRASHANTHA S

  6. 6.THEJASHWINI H S

  7. 7.SHANKAR K

  8. 8.PAVITHRA M R

  9. 9.VANSHIKA S

  10. 10.JAGADEESHA

  11. 11.SHUBHA S

  12. 12.J PRANAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 52/2026 - Karthik v. Sushila, Santhosha S, and Shwetha The Lok Adalath disposed of the suit after both parties filed a Joint Compromise Petition and agreed to settle the matter. The court found the compromise terms lawful and not against public policy, and accordingly passed a decree incorporating the settlement terms. The court also directed refund of court fees to the petitioner as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 52/2026 - Karthik v. Sushila, Santhosha S, and Shwetha The Lok Adalath disposed of the suit after both parties filed a Joint Compromise Petition and agreed to settle the matter. The court found the compromise terms lawful and not against public policy, and accordingly passed a decree incorporating the settlement terms. The court also directed refund of court fees to the petitioner as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case