S. A. RAJESH vs THE CHIEF OFFICER — 89/2015
Case under U/s 26 and Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc Section --. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS210003332015
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
89/2015
Filing Date
06-03-2015
Registration No
89/2015
Registration Date
07-03-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. A. RAJESH
Adv. G.N.NARAYANA GOWDA
Respondent(s)
THE CHIEF OFFICER
THE DIRECTOR
THE ASSISTANT CONSERVATIVE OFFICER,
RANGE FOREST OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: 445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 12-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: In O.S. No. 89/2015, the court recorded witness testimony on 27.03.2026 regarding a land dispute involving 448.17 acres in Survey No. 6, where 212.18 acres belong to the Forest Department and the remainder to the Revenue Department. The court examined documentary evidence and witness statements concerning the plaintiff's claims to the disputed property, including historical government notifications from 1927 and 1993, and land allotments made to various individuals between 2003-2004. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: In O.S. No. 89/2015, the court recorded witness testimony on 27.03.2026 regarding a land dispute involving 448.17 acres in Survey No. 6, where 212.18 acres belong to the Forest Department and the remainder to the Revenue Department. The court examined documentary evidence and witness statements concerning the plaintiff's claims to the disputed property, including historical government notifications from 1927 and 1993, and land allotments made to various individuals between 2003-2004. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts