NEELAMMA vs THE THASILDAR — 108/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210003172026

Filing Number

106/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

108/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

1095-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEELAMMA

    Adv. Prathap C S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE THASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 108/2026: Neelamma v. The Thasildar – Summary Decision: The court allowed Neelamma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Thasildar to register the death of her grandfather, Sri Chakramallaiah (died 20.10.1967), and issue a death certificate. The petitioner's unchallenged evidence, including genealogical documents and revenue reports confirming the death was never registered, satisfied the court's standard that factual death occurrence—not date precision—is what matters in such proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 108/2026: Neelamma v. The Thasildar – Summary Decision: The court allowed Neelamma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Thasildar to register the death of her grandfather, Sri Chakramallaiah (died 20.10.1967), and issue a death certificate. The petitioner's unchallenged evidence, including genealogical documents and revenue reports confirming the death was never registered, satisfied the court's standard that factual death occurrence—not date precision—is what matters in such proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case