KEMPAMMA vs THE THASILDAR — 89/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210002712026

Filing Number

85/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KEMPAMMA

    Adv. Mahesha S K

  2. 2.LAKSHMI

  3. 3.SUSHEELA

  4. 4.LALITHA

  5. 5.SHANTHAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE THASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Sri.Chikkanna @ Chikkannegowda (deceased on 25.10.1986) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' evidence credible as it remained unchallenged, with supporting documents from village officials and newspapers, and applied the principle that courts need only ascertain the fact of death—not the exact date—to grant such relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Sri.Chikkanna @ Chikkannegowda (deceased on 25.10.1986) and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' evidence credible as it remained unchallenged, with supporting documents from village officials and newspapers, and applied the principle that courts need only ascertain the fact of death—not the exact date—to grant such relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case