KARIGOWDA vs THE THASILDAR — 87/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS210002692026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
87/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KARIGOWDA
Adv. PREMAKUMAR.N
-
2.MANJULA
-
3.PRABHAKAR K
-
4.BHOOMIKA K
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE THASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge at H.D.Kote allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Sri. Bhaskar S/o Karigowda (who died on 08.04.2014) in official records and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' evidence credible, noting the respondent failed to appear despite service of notice, and applied the legal principle that the court need only ascertain the factum of death, not the exact date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
07-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 87/2026
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge at H.D.Kote allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Sri. Bhaskar S/o Karigowda (who died on 08.04.2014) in official records and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' evidence credible, noting the respondent failed to appear despite service of notice, and applied the legal principle that the court need only ascertain the factum of death, not the exact date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts