KARIGOWDA vs THE THASILDAR — 87/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210002692026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

83/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

KARIGOWDA

Adv. PREMAKUMAR.N

MANJULA

PRABHAKAR K

BHOOMIKA K

Respondent(s)

THE THASILDAR

Hearing History

Judge: 445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

12-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

09-02-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Orders

Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge at H.D.Kote allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Sri. Bhaskar S/o Karigowda (who died on 08.04.2014) in official records and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' evidence credible, noting the respondent failed to appear despite service of notice, and applied the legal principle that the court need only ascertain the factum of death, not the exact date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge at H.D.Kote allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The court directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Sri. Bhaskar S/o Karigowda (who died on 08.04.2014) in official records and issue a death certificate to the petitioners. The court found the petitioners' evidence credible, noting the respondent failed to appear despite service of notice, and applied the legal principle that the court need only ascertain the factum of death, not the exact date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case