JAVARAMMA vs THE THASILDAR — 83/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210002652026

Filing Number

79/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAVARAMMA

    Adv. SHANKARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE THASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 and directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Devamma W/o Gopalaiah (who died on 11.05.2011) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioner had established the factum of death through her testimony and supporting documents (including village accountant reports and mahazar), and the respondent's ex-parte absence and failure to challenge the evidence strengthened the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 83/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 and directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Devamma W/o Gopalaiah (who died on 11.05.2011) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioner had established the factum of death through her testimony and supporting documents (including village accountant reports and mahazar), and the respondent's ex-parte absence and failure to challenge the evidence strengthened the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case