JAVARAMMA vs THE THASILDAR — 83/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210002652026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

79/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

06-02-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

JAVARAMMA

Adv. SHANKARA

Respondent(s)

THE THASILDAR

Hearing History

Judge: 445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

12-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

ORDERS

06-02-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Orders

Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 and directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Devamma W/o Gopalaiah (who died on 11.05.2011) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioner had established the factum of death through her testimony and supporting documents (including village accountant reports and mahazar), and the respondent's ex-parte absence and failure to challenge the evidence strengthened the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 and directed the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Devamma W/o Gopalaiah (who died on 11.05.2011) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioner had established the factum of death through her testimony and supporting documents (including village accountant reports and mahazar), and the respondent's ex-parte absence and failure to challenge the evidence strengthened the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case