PRAMILA JYOTHI SEQUIERA vs THE THASILDAR — 82/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210002572026

Filing Number

78/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

82/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAMILA JYOTHI SEQUIERA

    Adv. SHANKARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE THASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge allowed Pramila Jyothi Sequiera's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register her birth details (born 06.12.1982) and issue a birth certificate. The court found her unchallenged documentary evidence—including SSLC marks card, school admission form, and Aadhaar card—sufficient to establish the fact of birth, noting that in such proceedings, the court ascertains the factum of birth rather than verifying the exact date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 82/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge allowed Pramila Jyothi Sequiera's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Tahashildar to register her birth details (born 06.12.1982) and issue a birth certificate. The court found her unchallenged documentary evidence—including SSLC marks card, school admission form, and Aadhaar card—sufficient to establish the fact of birth, noting that in such proceedings, the court ascertains the factum of birth rather than verifying the exact date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case