MAHADEVA vs SHAMASUNDARA V — 23/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KAMS210002212026

Filing Number

23/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

23/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVA

    Adv. SADASHIVAPPA .B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAMASUNDARA V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court found a prima facie case against the accused for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,00,000 dated 11.10.2025 which was returned unpaid with "EXCEEDS ARRANGEMENTS" and despite notice, payment was not made. The court directed registration of the case and issuance of summons to the accused through court and speed post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Call On

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found a prima facie case against the accused for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 1,00,000 dated 11.10.2025 which was returned unpaid with "EXCEEDS ARRANGEMENTS" and despite notice, payment was not made. The court directed registration of the case and issuance of summons to the accused through court and speed post. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case