DASANAYAKA vs THE THASILDAR — 63/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS210001842026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

59/2026

Filing Date

24-01-2026

Registration No

63/2026

Registration Date

24-01-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

DASANAYAKA

Adv. SRINIVASA .V

CHIKKADASANAYAKA

SANNAMANCHANAYAKA

NATARAJU

JAYALAKSHMI

Respondent(s)

THE THASILDAR

Hearing History

Judge: 445-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC H D KOTE

07-03-2026

Disposed

03-03-2026

ORDERS

24-01-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Orders

Summary The Principal Civil Judge allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 by directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Maridevamma W/o. Late Dasanayaka (who died on 04.07.2019) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proven the fact of death through witness testimony, documentary evidence including village accountant reports and newspaper publications, and noted the respondent's failure to contest the claims despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

03-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Civil Judge allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 by directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Maridevamma W/o. Late Dasanayaka (who died on 04.07.2019) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proven the fact of death through witness testimony, documentary evidence including village accountant reports and newspaper publications, and noted the respondent's failure to contest the claims despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case