DASANAYAKA vs THE THASILDAR — 63/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS210001842026
Filing Number
59/2026
Filing Date
24-Jan-2026
Registration No
63/2026
Registration Date
24-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE
Judge
445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DASANAYAKA
Adv. SRINIVASA .V
-
2.CHIKKADASANAYAKA
-
3.SANNAMANCHANAYAKA
-
4.NATARAJU
-
5.JAYALAKSHMI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE THASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Principal Civil Judge allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 by directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Maridevamma W/o. Late Dasanayaka (who died on 04.07.2019) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proven the fact of death through witness testimony, documentary evidence including village accountant reports and newspaper publications, and noted the respondent's failure to contest the claims despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
03-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote
-
24-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 63/2026
Summary The Principal Civil Judge allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 by directing the Tahashildar to register the death of Smt. Maridevamma W/o. Late Dasanayaka (who died on 04.07.2019) and issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioners had sufficiently proven the fact of death through witness testimony, documentary evidence including village accountant reports and newspaper publications, and noted the respondent's failure to contest the claims despite proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts