HABIB vs SHABEENA TAJ — 9/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: For Settlement. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

For Settlement Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS210000722023

Filing Number

9/2023

Filing Date

09-Jan-2023

Registration No

9/2023

Registration Date

09-Jan-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H.D.KOTE

Judge

445-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HABIB

    Adv. K.S.MOHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHABEENA TAJ

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    For Settlement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary of Case 9/2023 - HABIB v. SHABEENA TAJ The case involves a witness (Habib) providing testimony dated 29.01.2026 regarding a loan dispute. Habib testified that he lent Rs. 4,00,000 to the respondent (referred to as "ARP") in 2022, with an agreement to repay within two months at a certain interest rate. Habib claimed they met 2-3 times before the loan, and ARP indicated the money was necessary. However, Habib stated there was no written agreement, no specific documentation regarding the loan's purpose, and the matter was never formally recorded in writing or brought before the main court proceedings. The case was adjourned to allow the respondent's counsel additional time to present their response. The witness testimony was recorded and the matter stands pending further proceedings in the Hubballi High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  13. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  14. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  15. 01-Jul-2025

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  16. 07-May-2025

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  17. 22-Jan-2025

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  18. 13-Nov-2024

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  19. 11-Sep-2024

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  20. 30-Aug-2024

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  21. 08-Jul-2024

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  22. 08-Apr-2024

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  23. 06-Feb-2024

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  24. 13-Dec-2023

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  25. 11-Oct-2023

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  26. 26-Aug-2023

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  27. 27-Jul-2023

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  28. 15-Jun-2023

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  29. 12-May-2023

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  30. 06-Mar-2023

    NBW Issued

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

  31. 31-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 09-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 9/2023 - HABIB v. SHABEENA TAJ The case involves a witness (Habib) providing testimony dated 29.01.2026 regarding a loan dispute. Habib testified that he lent Rs. 4,00,000 to the respondent (referred to as "ARP") in 2022, with an agreement to repay within two months at a certain interest rate. Habib claimed they met 2-3 times before the loan, and ARP indicated the money was necessary. However, Habib stated there was no written agreement, no specific documentation regarding the loan's purpose, and the matter was never formally recorded in writing or brought before the main court proceedings. The case was adjourned to allow the respondent's counsel additional time to present their response. The witness testimony was recorded and the matter stands pending further proceedings in the Hubballi High Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case