GOWRAMMA vs NAGANAYAKA Advocate - G.N.NARAYANA GOWDA — 18/2024

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

OrdersView PDF

Case Summary: O.S. No. 18/2024 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court restrained defendants from alienating the disputed ancestral property until the main partition suit is resolved. Key Facts: Plaintiffs (Gowramma and Rajamma) sought partition of ancestral joint family property originally owned by Ranganayaka. After his death in 2018 and his wife's death in 2011, defendants allegedly refused to allocate plaintiffs' shares despite multiple requests. The court found the plaintiffs established all three requirements for temporary injunction: prima facie case, balance of convenience favoring plaintiffs, and irreparable injury if relief denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Evidence

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Orders On IA

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Hg On IA

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Hg On IA

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Written Stmt

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

Written Stmt

I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC H D Kote

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 18/2024