Karnataka Gramin Bank vs MANJULA — 263/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7 R.1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS200009582025
Filing Number
265/2025
Filing Date
16-Dec-2025
Registration No
263/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karnataka Gramin Bank
Adv. B S Sangameshwara
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANJULA
-
2.K.C. SWAMY
-
3.VISHWANATHA K.N.
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
14-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
13-Mar-2026
Refer to La/Mediation
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
26-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
In O.S. Case No. 263/2025, Karnataka Gramin Bank (petitioner) filed a suit against Manjula, K.C. Swamy, and Vishwanatha K.N. (respondents). The case was heard on 26.02.2026, and the petitioner's counsel submitted extensive documentary evidence including loan agreements, mortgages, commitment letters, bank statements, and account statements spanning multiple loan accounts. The respondents appeared uncontested and did not raise any objections. The case was adjourned with witnesses summoned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 263/2025
In O.S. Case No. 263/2025, Karnataka Gramin Bank (petitioner) filed a suit against Manjula, K.C. Swamy, and Vishwanatha K.N. (respondents). The case was heard on 26.02.2026, and the petitioner's counsel submitted extensive documentary evidence including loan agreements, mortgages, commitment letters, bank statements, and account statements spanning multiple loan accounts. The respondents appeared uncontested and did not raise any objections. The case was adjourned with witnesses summoned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts