SANNAMMA vs MALAMMA — 216/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7 RU.1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS200007952025
Filing Number
221/2025
Filing Date
26-11-2025
Registration No
216/2025
Registration Date
26-11-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANNAMMA
Adv. PUTTASWAMY. K
Respondent(s)
MALAMMA
BASAVEGOWDA
BASAVARAJU
MANYA
MEGHANA
SUSHEELA
THAMMANNA
MANVITHA
RUTVIKGOWDA
MAMATHA G.K.
SAKAMMA
PAVITHRA
AKASH. M
AVINASH. M
SAVITHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Disposed
Refer to LA/Mediation
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Refer to LA/Mediation |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S. 216/2025 (Sannamma v. Malamma & Others) The court approved a compromise decree in a property sale dispute. Sannamma sued defendants to enforce a land purchase agreement and recover ₹1 lakh balance payment. The parties settled amicably before the Lok Adalath on March 14, 2026: defendants agreed to execute a sale deed for 2 acres of land in H.D. Kote upon receiving the remaining ₹1 lakh, with ₹12 lakh already paid via cheques. The suit was decreed as per compromise, court fees were refunded to plaintiff, and both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 216/2025 (Sannamma v. Malamma & Others) The court approved a compromise decree in a property sale dispute. Sannamma sued defendants to enforce a land purchase agreement and recover ₹1 lakh balance payment. The parties settled amicably before the Lok Adalath on March 14, 2026: defendants agreed to execute a sale deed for 2 acres of land in H.D. Kote upon receiving the remaining ₹1 lakh, with ₹12 lakh already paid via cheques. The suit was decreed as per compromise, court fees were refunded to plaintiff, and both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts