BASAVARAJU vs BASAVANNA — 36/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.21 R.2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS200007392025
Filing Number
36/2025
Filing Date
27-Oct-2025
Registration No
36/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BASAVARAJU
Adv. T.H. GIRISH
Respondent(s)
-
1.BASAVANNA
-
2.JAYAMMA
-
3.SAVITHA
-
4.MANJU @ MANJULA
-
5.MURTHY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 36/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) heard Case 36/2025 between Basavaraju and respondents Basavanna, Jayamma, and Savitha. Both parties, along with their counsel, filed a joint settlement memo indicating they had resolved their dispute. The court, upon reviewing the memo and finding it satisfactory, closed the petition in accordance with the agreed terms and conditions of the joint settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
23-Jan-2026
Refer to La/Mediation
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
19-Jan-2026
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
17-Jan-2026
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
16-Jan-2026
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
28-Nov-2025
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
29-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2025
Case 36/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) heard Case 36/2025 between Basavaraju and respondents Basavanna, Jayamma, and Savitha. Both parties, along with their counsel, filed a joint settlement memo indicating they had resolved their dispute. The court, upon reviewing the memo and finding it satisfactory, closed the petition in accordance with the agreed terms and conditions of the joint settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts