NARAYANA vs PRADEEPA — 2749/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS200005192024

e-Filing Number

10-12-2024

Filing Number

2866/2024

Filing Date

10-Dec-2024

Registration No

2749/2024

Registration Date

17-Dec-2024

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE

Judge

1224-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARAYANA

    Adv. MAHESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEPA

  2. 2.CHINNASWAMY

  3. 3.THE MANAGER, BAJAJ ALIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Call On

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Call On

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: MVC 2749/2024 The insurance company (Bajaj Allianz) filed an application to reject Narayana's motor vehicle compensation claim as barred by limitation, since the accident occurred on 05.11.2023 but the petition was filed on 10.12.2024—over 13 months later, exceeding the 6-month statutory limit under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 2019. The court rejected the insurance company's application, holding that the Supreme Court has stayed operation of the 6-month limitation provision and directed tribunals not to dismiss accident claims solely on limitation grounds. Application dismissed with costs of Rs. 200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Call On

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  12. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  14. 13-Sep-2025

    Call On

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  15. 04-Sep-2025

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  16. 01-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  17. 04-Jul-2025

    W/S

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  18. 20-Jun-2025

    W/S

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  19. 29-May-2025

    Orders

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  20. 08-May-2025

    Orders

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  21. 05-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  22. 15-Mar-2025

    Objection

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  23. 22-Feb-2025

    Objection

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  24. 24-Jan-2025

    W/S

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  25. 21-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 10-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2749/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC 2749/2024 The insurance company (Bajaj Allianz) filed an application to reject Narayana's motor vehicle compensation claim as barred by limitation, since the accident occurred on 05.11.2023 but the petition was filed on 10.12.2024—over 13 months later, exceeding the 6-month statutory limit under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 2019. The court rejected the insurance company's application, holding that the Supreme Court has stayed operation of the 6-month limitation provision and directed tribunals not to dismiss accident claims solely on limitation grounds. Application dismissed with costs of Rs. 200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case