RAJALAKSHMI vs M. PADMINI — 90/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7 R1. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS200003242024
Filing Number
91/2024
Filing Date
30-Jul-2024
Registration No
90/2024
Registration Date
02-Aug-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJALAKSHMI
Adv. SADASHIVAPPA. B (SSB)
Respondent(s)
-
1.M. PADMINI
-
2.M. MURALI
-
3.M. NAVEENA
-
4.V. DAMODHARAN
-
5.V. SATHYAVELU
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
24-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
18-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
22-Jan-2026
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
19-Dec-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS.No.90/2024 Court: Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, H.D.Kote Date: 19 December 2025 Rajalakshmi filed a partition suit against defendants M. Padmini, M. Murali, M. Naveena, and others seeking partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties. Defendant No.5 (V. Sathyavelu) filed an application to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) & (d) CPC, contending no cause of action exists and the suit is barred by limitation. The court rejected Defendant No.5's application, finding the plaint clearly discloses a cause of action regarding the plaintiff's entitlement to property shares. The court held that whether the plaintiff had knowledge of an alleged oral family partition, her rights to the property, and limitation issues must be determined through full trial, not at the plaint rejection stage. Outcome: Application I.A No. III filed by Defendant No.5 is rejected; suit proceeds to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Dec-2025
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
16-Dec-2025
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
09-Dec-2025
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
27-Nov-2025
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
19-Nov-2025
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
05-Nov-2025
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
25-Oct-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
13-Aug-2025
Refer to La/Mediation
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
16-Jul-2025
Refer to La/Mediation
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
12-Jul-2025
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
03-Jul-2025
Refer to La/Mediation
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
05-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
28-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
14-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
19-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
25-Jan-2025
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
04-Jan-2025
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
03-Jan-2025
Notice
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
29-Nov-2024
Notice
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
15-Nov-2024
Objection
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
26-Oct-2024
W/S
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
26-Sep-2024
W/S
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
31-Aug-2024
W/S
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
03-Aug-2024
OrdersView PDF
-
03-Aug-2024
Summons
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
02-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 90/2024
Case Summary: OS.No.90/2024 Court: Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, H.D.Kote Date: 19 December 2025 Rajalakshmi filed a partition suit against defendants M. Padmini, M. Murali, M. Naveena, and others seeking partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties. Defendant No.5 (V. Sathyavelu) filed an application to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) & (d) CPC, contending no cause of action exists and the suit is barred by limitation. The court rejected Defendant No.5's application, finding the plaint clearly discloses a cause of action regarding the plaintiff's entitlement to property shares. The court held that whether the plaintiff had knowledge of an alleged oral family partition, her rights to the property, and limitation issues must be determined through full trial, not at the plaint rejection stage. Outcome: Application I.A No. III filed by Defendant No.5 is rejected; suit proceeds to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts