SANNAPPA@MADAPPA vs RANGEGOWDA — 60/2018

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 1. Status: STEPS. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS200002952018

STEPS

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

59/2018

Filing Date

16-08-2018

Registration No

60/2018

Registration Date

18-08-2018

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE

Judge

1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE

Acts & Sections

UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 1 of CPC Section 1

Petitioner(s)

SANNAPPA@MADAPPA

Adv. DORESWAMY

Respondent(s)

RANGEGOWDA

Hearing History

Judge: 1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE

17-03-2026

STEPS

07-03-2026

STEPS

21-02-2026

OBJECTION

04-02-2026

STEPS

28-01-2026

STEPS

Interim Orders

07-09-2019
Orders
07-04-2021
Deposition
09-02-2022
Orders
18-06-2022
Deposition
18-11-2022
Deposition
12-01-2023
Deposition
15-02-2023
Deposition
09-10-2020
Issue
23-06-2023
Deposition
29-11-2023
Orders
29-05-2024
Deposition
26-07-2024
Orders
12-09-2024
Deposition
25-10-2024
Deposition
23-01-2025
Deposition
07-02-2025
Deposition
11-06-2025
Deposition
08-01-2026
Orders

CASE SUMMARY Order: Application I.A. No. 28 ALLOWED The Senior Civil Judge, H.D. Kote, granted the plaintiff's application to send disputed document Ex.D12 to a handwriting expert for scientific examination of the signature/thumb impression allegedly belonging to the original plaintiff. The court found sufficient grounds exist to compare the signatures in the contested 1967 sale deed against admitted signatures in court records (vakalaath and original plaint) to determine document authenticity in this property dispute case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY Order: Application I.A. No. 28 ALLOWED The Senior Civil Judge, H.D. Kote, granted the plaintiff's application to send disputed document Ex.D12 to a handwriting expert for scientific examination of the signature/thumb impression allegedly belonging to the original plaintiff. The court found sufficient grounds exist to compare the signatures in the contested 1967 sale deed against admitted signatures in court records (vakalaath and original plaint) to determine document authenticity in this property dispute case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case