PARVATHAMMA(Legal Heir) vs THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER — 2/2023
Case under U/s 18 of La Act Section .. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases
CNR: KAMS200002122023
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2/2023
Filing Date
13-04-2023
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
13-04-2023
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARVATHAMMA(Legal Heir)
Adv. TRM
SHIVANNA
Respondent(s)
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: 1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Call On
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
Call On
Call On
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Call On | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-01-2026 | Call On | |
| 17-01-2026 | Call On |
Interim Orders
Summary In LAC No. 2/2023, the court heard witness testimony on 13.12.2024 in a land compensation dispute. The petitioner claimed entitlement to enhanced compensation for 37 guntas of land in Chamanhalli village (Survey No. 7/1), contending the compensation received 20+ years ago under Rule 12(2) was inadequate. The court rejected the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to file a timely application for enhanced compensation and therefore is not entitled to any additional relief. The late submission of the claim was deemed fatal to the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In LAC No. 2/2023, the court heard witness testimony on 13.12.2024 in a land compensation dispute. The petitioner claimed entitlement to enhanced compensation for 37 guntas of land in Chamanhalli village (Survey No. 7/1), contending the compensation received 20+ years ago under Rule 12(2) was inadequate. The court rejected the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to file a timely application for enhanced compensation and therefore is not entitled to any additional relief. The late submission of the claim was deemed fatal to the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts