PALANISWAMY vs VENKATESH — 45/2021
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section .. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS200001642021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
46/2021
Filing Date
17-04-2021
Registration No
45/2021
Registration Date
19-04-2021
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PALANISWAMY
Adv. KUMARA R
Respondent(s)
VENKATESH
Hearing History
Judge: 1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Disposed
Refer to LA/Mediation
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Refer to LA/Mediation | |
| 11-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Lok Adalath (O.S. No. 45/2021) decreed the suit based on a compromise petition filed jointly by plaintiff and defendant under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. The court found the compromise terms legally valid and voluntary, and accordingly recorded the settlement. The court also directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Lok Adalath (O.S. No. 45/2021) decreed the suit based on a compromise petition filed jointly by plaintiff and defendant under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. The court found the compromise terms legally valid and voluntary, and accordingly recorded the settlement. The court also directed refund of court fees to the plaintiff and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts