PUTTAMMA vs SHIVARAJAPPA — 33/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR. 7 RU.1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS200000952026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
32/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUTTAMMA
Adv. B.G. MAHADEVASWAMY
Respondent(s)
SHIVARAJAPPA
RAJAMMA
CHINNAMMA
PREMALEELA
MALA M.C.
KALPANA M.C.
THEJAS M.C.
Hearing History
Judge: 1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Disposed
Refer to LA/Mediation
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Refer to LA/Mediation | |
| 23-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
In case O.S.No.33/2026 before the Lok Adalath, the court decreed the suit in terms of a compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendants under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. The court found the compromise terms legally valid and voluntary after both parties acknowledged the petition's contents as true and correct, and accordingly disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In case O.S.No.33/2026 before the Lok Adalath, the court decreed the suit in terms of a compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendants under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. The court found the compromise terms legally valid and voluntary after both parties acknowledged the petition's contents as true and correct, and accordingly disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts