PUTTAMMA vs SHIVARAJAPPA — 33/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR. 7 RU.1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS200000952026
Filing Number
32/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUTTAMMA
Adv. B.G. MAHADEVASWAMY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIVARAJAPPA
-
2.RAJAMMA
-
3.CHINNAMMA
-
4.PREMALEELA
-
5.MALA M.C.
-
6.KALPANA M.C.
-
7.THEJAS M.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
In case O.S.No.33/2026 before the Lok Adalath, the court decreed the suit in terms of a compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendants under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. The court found the compromise terms legally valid and voluntary after both parties acknowledged the petition's contents as true and correct, and accordingly disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
07-Mar-2026
Refer to La/Mediation
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2026
In case O.S.No.33/2026 before the Lok Adalath, the court decreed the suit in terms of a compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendants under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. The court found the compromise terms legally valid and voluntary after both parties acknowledged the petition's contents as true and correct, and accordingly disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts