AKSHATHA KUMARI vs NINGAIAH — 9/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.VII RU.1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS200000332026
Filing Number
10/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
9/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AKSHATHA KUMARI
Adv. GANESH. S
Respondent(s)
NINGAIAH
KALAMMA
NINGARAJU
JAYAMMA
SUSHEELA
MANJU
ASHA H.D.
BHOOMIKA
VEENA
Hearing History
Judge: 1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Disposed
Call On
Refer to LA/Mediation
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Call On |
| 12-03-2026 | Refer to LA/Mediation |
| 21-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 9/2026 Summary: The court decreed the suit between petitioner Akshatha Kumari and respondents Ningaiah, Kalamma, and Ningaraju based on a compromise petition filed jointly by both parties under Order 23, Rule 3 of the CPC. The court found the compromise terms lawful and voluntary, and accordingly recorded it. The court also directed the office to refund the court fee to the plaintiff and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 9/2026 Summary: The court decreed the suit between petitioner Akshatha Kumari and respondents Ningaiah, Kalamma, and Ningaraju based on a compromise petition filed jointly by both parties under Order 23, Rule 3 of the CPC. The court found the compromise terms lawful and voluntary, and accordingly recorded it. The court also directed the office to refund the court fee to the plaintiff and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts