AKSHATHA KUMARI vs NINGAIAH — 9/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.VII RU.1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS200000332026

Filing Number

10/2026

Filing Date

21-Jan-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE

Judge

1224-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.VII RU.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKSHATHA KUMARI

    Adv. GANESH. S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NINGAIAH

  2. 2.KALAMMA

  3. 3.NINGARAJU

  4. 4.JAYAMMA

  5. 5.SUSHEELA

  6. 6.MANJU

  7. 7.ASHA H.D.

  8. 8.BHOOMIKA

  9. 9.VEENA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 9/2026 Summary: The court decreed the suit between petitioner Akshatha Kumari and respondents Ningaiah, Kalamma, and Ningaraju based on a compromise petition filed jointly by both parties under Order 23, Rule 3 of the CPC. The court found the compromise terms lawful and voluntary, and accordingly recorded it. The court also directed the office to refund the court fee to the plaintiff and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Call On

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 9/2026 Summary: The court decreed the suit between petitioner Akshatha Kumari and respondents Ningaiah, Kalamma, and Ningaraju based on a compromise petition filed jointly by both parties under Order 23, Rule 3 of the CPC. The court found the compromise terms lawful and voluntary, and accordingly recorded it. The court also directed the office to refund the court fee to the plaintiff and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case