CHANNASHETTY vs SYED SIRAJUDDIN — 2842/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080053652024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

22nd May 2026

e-Filing Number

09-12-2024

Filing Number

2802/2024

Filing Date

09-12-2024

Registration No

2842/2024

Registration Date

23-12-2024

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

CHANNASHETTY

Adv. BASAVARAJU N

Respondent(s)

SYED SIRAJUDDIN

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

06-04-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE

27-11-2025

EVIDENCE

18-10-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

18-07-2025
Issue
27-11-2025
Deposition
30-01-2026
Deposition
06-04-2026
Deposition

This document is a cross-examination transcript, not a court order with a final decision. It records the testimony of witness Channashetty (PW1) in a motor vehicle compensation case (MVC No. 2842/2024) heard on 06.04.2026 before the Court of SC & MACT, Mysuru. The witness consistently denied allegations that the motorcycle was uninsured, the rider lacked a valid license, or that he and the rider's conversation caused the accident; he maintained the accident was caused by a car coming from the opposite direction and that he suffered injuries and disability. No outcome/order is issued in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a cross-examination transcript, not a court order with a final decision. It records the testimony of witness Channashetty (PW1) in a motor vehicle compensation case (MVC No. 2842/2024) heard on 06.04.2026 before the Court of SC & MACT, Mysuru. The witness consistently denied allegations that the motorcycle was uninsured, the rider lacked a valid license, or that he and the rider's conversation caused the accident; he maintained the accident was caused by a car coming from the opposite direction and that he suffered injuries and disability. No outcome/order is issued in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case