HARSHA.N., R/BY HIS MOTHER NAVARATHNA vs SIDDAPPAJI S Advocate - Dayananda Murthy BR — 2337/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080042422023

Filing Number

2336/2023

Filing Date

06-Dec-2023

Registration No

2337/2023

Registration Date

08-Dec-2023

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARSHA.N., R/BY HIS MOTHER NAVARATHNA

    Adv. K.S.RAJAGOPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIDDAPPAJI S Advocate - Dayananda Murthy BR

  2. 2.THE MANGAGER, ZUNO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: MVC 2337/2023 This Motor Vehicles Case involves petitioner Harsha N. (represented by his mother Navarathna) against respondents Siddappaji S Advocate, Dayananda Murthy BR, and Zuno General Insurance Co. Ltd. The case pertains to a traffic accident (Cr.No.122/2023) at Siddartha Nagara Traffic Police Station, Mysuru. During the hearing on 16.04.2026, the petitioner's first witness (PW.1 - Harsha N.) testified and submitted documentary evidence including the FIR, FIS, charge sheet, spot panchanama, medical reports, discharge summaries, and bills. The court deferred further examination-in-chief of PW.1 at the request of the petitioner's counsel, indicating the case proceedings are ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 13-Dec-2025

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  10. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  11. 13-Sep-2025

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  12. 08-Sep-2025

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  14. 12-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  15. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  16. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  17. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  18. 08-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  19. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  20. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  21. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  22. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  23. 24-Sep-2024

    IssueView PDF

  24. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  25. 21-Aug-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  26. 25-Jul-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  27. 29-Jun-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  28. 28-May-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  29. 19-Apr-2024

    Appearance Of Party

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  30. 19-Mar-2024

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  31. 12-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 06-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2337/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC 2337/2023 This Motor Vehicles Case involves petitioner Harsha N. (represented by his mother Navarathna) against respondents Siddappaji S Advocate, Dayananda Murthy BR, and Zuno General Insurance Co. Ltd. The case pertains to a traffic accident (Cr.No.122/2023) at Siddartha Nagara Traffic Police Station, Mysuru. During the hearing on 16.04.2026, the petitioner's first witness (PW.1 - Harsha N.) testified and submitted documentary evidence including the FIR, FIS, charge sheet, spot panchanama, medical reports, discharge summaries, and bills. The court deferred further examination-in-chief of PW.1 at the request of the petitioner's counsel, indicating the case proceedings are ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case