MAHESHA vs VINAY — 2098/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: Objections. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080039652024
Filing Number
2139/2024
Filing Date
19-Sep-2024
Registration No
2098/2024
Registration Date
23-Sep-2024
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
859-Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESHA
Adv. N.C.SHIVANANDA SWAMY
Respondent(s)
-
1.VINAY
-
2.THE MANAGER, IFFCO TOKIO GIC
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
20-Jan-2026
OrdersView PDF
CASE SUMMARY The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Mysuru dismissed the insurance company's (Iffco Tokio) application seeking rejection of the compensation petition on limitation grounds. Although the petitioner filed the claim on 19.09.2024 for an accident occurring on 13.03.2024 (exceeding the six-month statutory limit), the tribunal held that the FIR lodged within five days of the accident should be treated as the claim petition per Supreme Court precedent, thereby satisfying the limitation requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
19-Jan-2026
Orders
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
03-Dec-2025
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
28-Nov-2025
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
14-Oct-2025
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
30-Jun-2025
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
25-Mar-2025
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
20-Jan-2025
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
30-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2098/2024
CASE SUMMARY The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Mysuru dismissed the insurance company's (Iffco Tokio) application seeking rejection of the compensation petition on limitation grounds. Although the petitioner filed the claim on 19.09.2024 for an accident occurring on 13.03.2024 (exceeding the six-month statutory limit), the tribunal held that the FIR lodged within five days of the accident should be treated as the claim petition per Supreme Court precedent, thereby satisfying the limitation requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts