MADHU J vs RAGHAVENDRA — 1858/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080035412024
Filing Number
1882/2024
Filing Date
14-Aug-2024
Registration No
1858/2024
Registration Date
21-Aug-2024
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHU J
Adv. B. RAMEGOWDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAGHAVENDRA
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
-
3.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Madhu J and insurance respondents for ₹7,67,000, disposing of the compensation dispute. The court ordered the full amount be released to the petitioner, finding it just and necessary given the documented medical expenses and nature of injuries suffered, and directed Respondent No.2 to deposit the amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Feb-2026
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Jan-2026
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
02-Dec-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Oct-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Aug-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
26-Jun-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
24-Apr-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Mar-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Jan-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Nov-2024
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
25-Sep-2024
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
24-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1858/2024
The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Madhu J and insurance respondents for ₹7,67,000, disposing of the compensation dispute. The court ordered the full amount be released to the petitioner, finding it just and necessary given the documented medical expenses and nature of injuries suffered, and directed Respondent No.2 to deposit the amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts