GIRISHA vs SANTHOSHA — 1839/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 21st April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080035032024
Filing Number
1868/2024
Filing Date
13-Aug-2024
Registration No
1839/2024
Registration Date
20-Aug-2024
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GIRISHA
Adv. Shivaramu AS
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANTHOSHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: MVC 1839/24 (Girisha v. Santhosha) The court dismissed the petition as "not pressed" after the petitioner voluntarily withdrew it through counsel's memo. The petitioner confirmed the withdrawal was voluntary, citing a duplicate petition already registered, and stated he faced no threats or coercion. The Principal Judge of the SC & MACT Court, Mysuru, granted the dismissal order accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Apr-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
25-Feb-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Dec-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Nov-2025
IssueView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Settlement
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
29-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
29-Jul-2025
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Feb-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
20-Dec-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Oct-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Sep-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1839/2024
Case Summary: MVC 1839/24 (Girisha v. Santhosha) The court dismissed the petition as "not pressed" after the petitioner voluntarily withdrew it through counsel's memo. The petitioner confirmed the withdrawal was voluntary, citing a duplicate petition already registered, and stated he faced no threats or coercion. The Principal Judge of the SC & MACT Court, Mysuru, granted the dismissal order accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts