RAVI KIRAN.S. vs NARASIMHA — 3218/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S.166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080034992025

Filing Number

3255/2025

Filing Date

28-Nov-2025

Registration No

3218/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S.166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KIRAN.S.

    Adv. M.B.GANESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARASIMHA

  2. 2.SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 3218/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Ravi Kiran.S. and respondents Narasimha and SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. for ₹8,10,000. The court approved the compromise, finding it legally enforceable and just, and directed SBI General Insurance (Respondent No. 2) to deposit the full amount without delay, releasing the entire compensation to the petitioner given his medical expenses and capacity to handle the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3218/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 3218/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Ravi Kiran.S. and respondents Narasimha and SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. for ₹8,10,000. The court approved the compromise, finding it legally enforceable and just, and directed SBI General Insurance (Respondent No. 2) to deposit the full amount without delay, releasing the entire compensation to the petitioner given his medical expenses and capacity to handle the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case