MALLESHA. N vs HUMMERALI — 3166/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080034352025
Filing Number
3195/2025
Filing Date
24-Nov-2025
Registration No
3166/2025
Registration Date
25-Nov-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MALLESHA. N
Adv. K.V.YOGESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.HUMMERALI
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL BRANCH MANAGER,NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary of Case 3166/2025 (MALLESHA. N v. HUMMERALI and NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.) The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Mallesha N and respondents, whereby the parties agreed to compromise for ₹9,25,000. The court found the compromise legally enforceable after confirming the petitioner's voluntary consent without coercion. The court ordered New India Insurance Co. Ltd. to deposit the entire settlement amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay, considering the petitioner's medical expenses and capacity to manage the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
11-Feb-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3166/2025
Summary of Case 3166/2025 (MALLESHA. N v. HUMMERALI and NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.) The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Mallesha N and respondents, whereby the parties agreed to compromise for ₹9,25,000. The court found the compromise legally enforceable after confirming the petitioner's voluntary consent without coercion. The court ordered New India Insurance Co. Ltd. to deposit the entire settlement amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay, considering the petitioner's medical expenses and capacity to manage the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts