SUNITHA vs ANIL ALIAS ANIL KUMAR — 3141/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080034142025

Filing Number

3085/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

3141/2025

Registration Date

24-Nov-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

859-Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITHA

    Adv. LAKSHMIKANTHA.K.J

  2. 2.RASHMIKA, MINOR, REP.BY.NATURAL GUARDIAN AS HER MOTHER SUNITHA.

  3. 3.RITHESH GOWDA, MINOR, REP.BY.NATURAL GUARDIAN AS HIS MOTHER SUNITHA.

  4. 4.VARADEGOWDA

  5. 5.NAGAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANIL ALIAS ANIL KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the petitioner's interlocutory application seeking transfer of the case to Hunsur Jurisdictional Court under Section 151 CPC. Although both parties reside in Hunsur Taluk and the respondent did not object, the court held it lacked the power to directly transfer the petition and therefore returned the case to the petitioner to file it before the proper jurisdictional court. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Objections

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3141/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the petitioner's interlocutory application seeking transfer of the case to Hunsur Jurisdictional Court under Section 151 CPC. Although both parties reside in Hunsur Taluk and the respondent did not object, the court held it lacked the power to directly transfer the petition and therefore returned the case to the petitioner to file it before the proper jurisdictional court. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case