MANJU vs VISHWANATH. B M — 3116/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080033872025

Filing Number

3163/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

3116/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJU

    Adv. SIDDARAJU.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHWANATH. B M

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 3116/2025 Summary: Manju's petition against Vishwanath B M and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. was settled through Lok Adalath conciliation for ₹8,07,000. The court accepted the joint settlement memo, finding the petitioner's consent voluntary and competent, and directed the insurer to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay. The court approved releasing the entire compensation to the petitioner, considering the medical expenses incurred, injury severity, and petitioner's capability to manage the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3116/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 3116/2025 Summary: Manju's petition against Vishwanath B M and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. was settled through Lok Adalath conciliation for ₹8,07,000. The court accepted the joint settlement memo, finding the petitioner's consent voluntary and competent, and directed the insurer to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay. The court approved releasing the entire compensation to the petitioner, considering the medical expenses incurred, injury severity, and petitioner's capability to manage the funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case