KUMARACHARI. M P vs MAHADEVA. B — 3113/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080033842025

Filing Number

3162/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

3113/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUMARACHARI. M P

    Adv. B.S.SWAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVA. B

  2. 2.NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 3113/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a joint settlement between petitioner Kumarachari M P and respondents Mahadeva B and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. for ₹7,60,000. The court approved the compromise as legally enforceable and dismissed the petition, directing respondent No. 2 (the insurance company) to deposit the full settlement amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    IssueView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3113/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 3113/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a joint settlement between petitioner Kumarachari M P and respondents Mahadeva B and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. for ₹7,60,000. The court approved the compromise as legally enforceable and dismissed the petition, directing respondent No. 2 (the insurance company) to deposit the full settlement amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case