DODDA NAGAIAH vs SILAMBARASAN. H — 3112/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080033832025

Filing Number

3161/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

3112/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DODDA NAGAIAH

    Adv. B.S.SWAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SILAMBARASAN. H

  2. 2.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: Dodda Nagaiah v. Silambarasan. H and United India Insurance Co. Ltd (3112/2025) The court accepted an out-of-court settlement between the parties for ₹4,65,000 after confirming the petitioner's voluntary consent, competency, and absence of duress. The petition was disposed of per the compromise terms, with United India Insurance Co. Ltd (Respondent No. 2) directed to deposit the full amount immediately, considering the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3112/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Dodda Nagaiah v. Silambarasan. H and United India Insurance Co. Ltd (3112/2025) The court accepted an out-of-court settlement between the parties for ₹4,65,000 after confirming the petitioner's voluntary consent, competency, and absence of duress. The petition was disposed of per the compromise terms, with United India Insurance Co. Ltd (Respondent No. 2) directed to deposit the full amount immediately, considering the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case