RAJESH.C.C. vs CHANDAN.C.M — 2960/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080032312025

Filing Number

3022/2025

Filing Date

07-Nov-2025

Registration No

2960/2025

Registration Date

07-Nov-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH.C.C.

    Adv. B.S.SWAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDAN.C.M

  2. 2.INDRA GAUTAM

  3. 3.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 2960/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Rajesh C.C. and respondents Chandan C.M., Indra Gautam, and Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd for ₹5,90,000. The court found the parties competent and the settlement terms legally enforceable. Respondent No. 2 (insurance company) was directed to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay, considering the medical expenses incurred and nature of injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2960/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2960/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Rajesh C.C. and respondents Chandan C.M., Indra Gautam, and Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd for ₹5,90,000. The court found the parties competent and the settlement terms legally enforceable. Respondent No. 2 (insurance company) was directed to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay, considering the medical expenses incurred and nature of injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case