RAMEGOWDA vs HARISHA Advocate - SAVITHA — 1769/2022
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: SETTLEMENT. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080030312022
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
1804/2022
Filing Date
28-11-2022
Registration No
1769/2022
Registration Date
28-11-2022
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMEGOWDA
Adv. PURUSHOTHAM.G.M
Respondent(s)
HARISHA Advocate - SAVITHA
THE MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.,
Adv. NP RANJAN
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
SETTLEMENT
EVIDENCE
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 14-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 03-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case 1769/2022 Summary: The court allowed petitioner Ramegowda's application to amend the petition by correcting typographical errors in the description of his avocation. The court permitted the petitioner to rectify inconsistencies where his occupation was incorrectly stated in Para 5, and to consistently reflect it as "Business and Agriculture" throughout the petition. The petitioner must complete the amendment and file the corrected petition within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 1769/2022 Summary: The court allowed petitioner Ramegowda's application to amend the petition by correcting typographical errors in the description of his avocation. The court permitted the petitioner to rectify inconsistencies where his occupation was incorrectly stated in Para 5, and to consistently reflect it as "Business and Agriculture" throughout the petition. The petitioner must complete the amendment and file the corrected petition within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts