MAHALAKSHMI M S vs ARJUN. R — 2706/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080029482025

e-Filing Number

03-10-2025

Filing Number

2706/2025

Filing Date

04-Oct-2025

Registration No

2706/2025

Registration Date

04-Oct-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHALAKSHMI M S

    Adv. RACHANA

  2. 2.MANJUNATH. R

    Adv. RACHANA

  3. 3.DHANUSHREE. R

    Adv. RACHANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARJUN. R

  2. 2.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, FUTURE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 2706/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between the petitioners (Mahalakshmi M S, Manjunath R, and Dhanushree R) and respondents for ₹25,80,000. The court disposed of the petition after confirming the parties voluntarily agreed to compromise without coercion, finding the settlement terms legally enforceable and the petitioners competent to receive the full amount given their substantial medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 18-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2706/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2706/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between the petitioners (Mahalakshmi M S, Manjunath R, and Dhanushree R) and respondents for ₹25,80,000. The court disposed of the petition after confirming the parties voluntarily agreed to compromise without coercion, finding the settlement terms legally enforceable and the petitioners competent to receive the full amount given their substantial medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case