MUJAHEED PASHA vs ABHISHEK.R — 2620/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080028342025

Filing Number

2620/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

2620/2025

Registration Date

24-Sep-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUJAHEED PASHA

    Adv. K.B.NAGESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK.R

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Mujaheed Pasha and respondents Abhishek.R and Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. for ₹10,85,000. The court disposed of the petition based on the joint memo, finding the compromise legally enforceable and the petitioner competent. The insurance company was directed to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay, as the petitioner demonstrated substantial medical expenses and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 27-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2620/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Mujaheed Pasha and respondents Abhishek.R and Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. for ₹10,85,000. The court disposed of the petition based on the joint memo, finding the compromise legally enforceable and the petitioner competent. The insurance company was directed to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay, as the petitioner demonstrated substantial medical expenses and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case