AJAY vs T.M.MAHESH — 2619/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080028332025

Filing Number

2619/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

2619/2025

Registration Date

24-Sep-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY

    Adv. MAHESH.D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T.M.MAHESH

  2. 2.MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Ajay and respondents T.M. Mahesh and The New India Assurance Company Ltd. for ₹5,98,000, disposing of the petition. The court ordered full release of the compensation amount to the petitioner, finding it just and necessary considering the medical expenses incurred and injuries suffered, and directed the insurer to deposit the amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 27-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2619/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Ajay and respondents T.M. Mahesh and The New India Assurance Company Ltd. for ₹5,98,000, disposing of the petition. The court ordered full release of the compensation amount to the petitioner, finding it just and necessary considering the medical expenses incurred and injuries suffered, and directed the insurer to deposit the amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case