SHASHANK.M vs T.M.MAHESH — 2618/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080028322025

Filing Number

2618/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

2618/2025

Registration Date

24-Sep-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHASHANK.M

    Adv. MAHESH.D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.T.M.MAHESH

  2. 2.MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: SHASHANK.M v. T.M.MAHESH and THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD (2618/2025) The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement compromise between the parties for ₹7,10,000. The court approved the joint memo filed by both parties, finding the petitioner's consent to be voluntary and free from coercion, and that both parties were competent to settle. The court directed the respondent insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount without unreasonable delay, considering the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 27-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2618/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SHASHANK.M v. T.M.MAHESH and THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD (2618/2025) The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement compromise between the parties for ₹7,10,000. The court approved the joint memo filed by both parties, finding the petitioner's consent to be voluntary and free from coercion, and that both parties were competent to settle. The court directed the respondent insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount without unreasonable delay, considering the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case