SHASHANK.M vs T.M.MAHESH — 2618/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080028322025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2618/2025

Filing Date

23-09-2025

Registration No

2618/2025

Registration Date

24-09-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

SHASHANK.M

Adv. MAHESH.D

Respondent(s)

T.M.MAHESH

MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Hearing History

Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

OBJECTIONS

30-01-2026

OBJECTIONS

03-12-2025

OBJECTIONS

27-09-2025

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: SHASHANK.M v. T.M.MAHESH and THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD (2618/2025) The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement compromise between the parties for ₹7,10,000. The court approved the joint memo filed by both parties, finding the petitioner's consent to be voluntary and free from coercion, and that both parties were competent to settle. The court directed the respondent insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount without unreasonable delay, considering the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SHASHANK.M v. T.M.MAHESH and THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD (2618/2025) The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement compromise between the parties for ₹7,10,000. The court approved the joint memo filed by both parties, finding the petitioner's consent to be voluntary and free from coercion, and that both parties were competent to settle. The court directed the respondent insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount without unreasonable delay, considering the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case