SURAJ vs HANGOVAN — 2547/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080027622025
Filing Number
2547/2025
Filing Date
17-09-2025
Registration No
2547/2025
Registration Date
18-09-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURAJ
Adv. V.B.GIRISH
Respondent(s)
HANGOVAN
THE DIVISIONAL BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Disposed
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | NOTICE |
| 30-01-2026 | NOTICE |
| 29-11-2025 | NOTICE |
| 20-09-2025 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 2547/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Suraj and respondents Hangovan and United India Insurance Company Ltd. for ₹12,80,055. The court approved the compromise after confirming the petitioner's voluntary consent and competency, and directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay, noting the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injury severity justified releasing the entire compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 2547/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Suraj and respondents Hangovan and United India Insurance Company Ltd. for ₹12,80,055. The court approved the compromise after confirming the petitioner's voluntary consent and competency, and directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay, noting the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injury severity justified releasing the entire compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts