DHANALAKSHMI. G vs GOVINDARAJU — 2490/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080027472025
e-Filing Number
09-09-2025
Filing Number
2490/2025
Filing Date
11-09-2025
Registration No
2490/2025
Registration Date
11-09-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANALAKSHMI. G
Adv. H R MAHADEVA PRABHU
Respondent(s)
GOVINDARAJU
THE MANAGER, SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Disposed
A.D.R.
NOTICE
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 06-02-2026 | NOTICE |
| 13-12-2025 | A.D.R. |
| 27-11-2025 | A.D.R. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 2490/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Dhanalakshmi G and respondent Sriram General Insurance Company for ₹3,70,000 in an insurance compensation dispute. The court approved the joint memo after confirming the petitioner's voluntary consent without coercion, finding the settlement terms legally enforceable. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount to the petitioner, deeming her capable of handling the funds given her medical expenses and injury nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 2490/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Dhanalakshmi G and respondent Sriram General Insurance Company for ₹3,70,000 in an insurance compensation dispute. The court approved the joint memo after confirming the petitioner's voluntary consent without coercion, finding the settlement terms legally enforceable. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount to the petitioner, deeming her capable of handling the funds given her medical expenses and injury nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts