RENUKA vs BHASKAR — 2488/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080027452025
e-Filing Number
23-08-2025
Filing Number
2488/2025
Filing Date
11-09-2025
Registration No
2488/2025
Registration Date
11-09-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RENUKA
Adv. H R MAHADEVA PRABHU
Respondent(s)
BHASKAR
THE MANAGER, SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Disposed
A.D.R.
SETTLEMENT
NOTICE
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 30-01-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 27-11-2025 | NOTICE |
| 22-09-2025 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 2488/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Renuka and respondents Bhaskar and Sriram General Insurance Company Ltd for ₹4,60,000. The court found the compromise voluntary, legally enforceable, and appropriate given the petitioner's medical expenses and injury nature. Respondent No.2 (insurance company) was directed to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 2488/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Renuka and respondents Bhaskar and Sriram General Insurance Company Ltd for ₹4,60,000. The court found the compromise voluntary, legally enforceable, and appropriate given the petitioner's medical expenses and injury nature. Respondent No.2 (insurance company) was directed to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts