N.MURALIDHARA vs SHIVAKUMAR.P — 1536/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080026912023
Filing Number
1516/2023
Filing Date
05-Aug-2023
Registration No
1536/2023
Registration Date
08-Aug-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.N.MURALIDHARA
Adv. K.ISHWAR BHAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIVAKUMAR.P
-
2.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COM LTD
Adv. A.J. SUBRAMANYA SHARMA
Case History
-
25-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
31-Jan-2026
Call On
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Dec-2025
Orders
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
20-Nov-2025
Orders
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
31-Oct-2025
Arguments
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Oct-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Sep-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
03-Sep-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Jul-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
02-Jul-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
This is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from Motor Vehicles Claim case MVC 1536/2023 before the Principal Judge's Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. Dr. Ravikiran H.G, an orthopedic consultant at Manipal Hospital, testified on 10.06.2025 regarding treatment of an accident victim (petitioner in MVC 1537/2023) who sustained fractures requiring surgical implants. The witness confirmed the patient underwent conservative treatment and showed gradual improvement during follow-up consultations, though some implants remain in situ and he advised their removal; he also assessed disability limited to the left upper limb and right lower limb, noting the patient may experience slight inconvenience in her duties as a lecturer but rejected suggestions that his disability assessment was exaggerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
22-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
22-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Nov-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
19-Sep-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
19-Sep-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
23-Jul-2024
IssueView PDF
-
23-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Jun-2024
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
30-May-2024
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
15-Apr-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Mar-2024
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
25-Jan-2024
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
26-Dec-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Nov-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Oct-2023
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1536/2023
This is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from Motor Vehicles Claim case MVC 1536/2023 before the Principal Judge's Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. Dr. Ravikiran H.G, an orthopedic consultant at Manipal Hospital, testified on 10.06.2025 regarding treatment of an accident victim (petitioner in MVC 1537/2023) who sustained fractures requiring surgical implants. The witness confirmed the patient underwent conservative treatment and showed gradual improvement during follow-up consultations, though some implants remain in situ and he advised their removal; he also assessed disability limited to the left upper limb and right lower limb, noting the patient may experience slight inconvenience in her duties as a lecturer but rejected suggestions that his disability assessment was exaggerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts