N.MURALIDHARA vs SHIVAKUMAR.P — 1536/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080026912023
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1516/2023
Filing Date
05-08-2023
Registration No
1536/2023
Registration Date
08-08-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.MURALIDHARA
Adv. K.ISHWAR BHAT
Respondent(s)
SHIVAKUMAR.P
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COM LTD
Adv. A.J. SUBRAMANYA SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
Call On
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 31-01-2026 | Call On | |
| 22-12-2025 | ORDERS | |
| 20-11-2025 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
This is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from Motor Vehicles Claim case MVC 1536/2023 before the Principal Judge's Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. Dr. Ravikiran H.G, an orthopedic consultant at Manipal Hospital, testified on 10.06.2025 regarding treatment of an accident victim (petitioner in MVC 1537/2023) who sustained fractures requiring surgical implants. The witness confirmed the patient underwent conservative treatment and showed gradual improvement during follow-up consultations, though some implants remain in situ and he advised their removal; he also assessed disability limited to the left upper limb and right lower limb, noting the patient may experience slight inconvenience in her duties as a lecturer but rejected suggestions that his disability assessment was exaggerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness examination record (not a final court order) from Motor Vehicles Claim case MVC 1536/2023 before the Principal Judge's Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. Dr. Ravikiran H.G, an orthopedic consultant at Manipal Hospital, testified on 10.06.2025 regarding treatment of an accident victim (petitioner in MVC 1537/2023) who sustained fractures requiring surgical implants. The witness confirmed the patient underwent conservative treatment and showed gradual improvement during follow-up consultations, though some implants remain in situ and he advised their removal; he also assessed disability limited to the left upper limb and right lower limb, noting the patient may experience slight inconvenience in her duties as a lecturer but rejected suggestions that his disability assessment was exaggerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts