S.SIDDARAJU vs IRFAN KHAN — 2402/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080026182025

Filing Number

2402/2025

Filing Date

30-Aug-2025

Registration No

2402/2025

Registration Date

01-Sep-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

859-Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.SIDDARAJU

    Adv. Shivaramu AS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IRFAN KHAN

  2. 2.GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE CO.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary The National Lok Adalath allowed the petition and approved a settlement whereby Respondent No. 2 agreed to pay Rs. 2,30,000 to the petitioner within 2 months, with 6% per annum interest if payment is delayed. The claim against Respondent No. 1 was dismissed, and the entire settlement amount was ordered to be released to the petitioner considering the medical expenses already incurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  5. 29-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  6. 04-Nov-2025

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  7. 04-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 30-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2402/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The National Lok Adalath allowed the petition and approved a settlement whereby Respondent No. 2 agreed to pay Rs. 2,30,000 to the petitioner within 2 months, with 6% per annum interest if payment is delayed. The claim against Respondent No. 1 was dismissed, and the entire settlement amount was ordered to be released to the petitioner considering the medical expenses already incurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case