LAKSHMAMMA vs SHIVU.P — 2292/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s.166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080025382025

Filing Number

2292/2025

Filing Date

19-Aug-2025

Registration No

2292/2025

Registration Date

19-Aug-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s.166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKSHMAMMA

    Adv. V.B.GIRISH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVU.P

  2. 2.THE DIVISIONAL BRANCH MANAGER, NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 2292/2025 - Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between Lakshmamma and New India Insurance Company Limited for ₹4,10,000. The petitioner sought full compensation release citing substantial medical expenses and incurred loans. The court approved the compromise as legally enforceable, finding the petitioner competent and the settlement voluntary without coercion, and directed the insurance company to deposit the entire settlement amount to the petitioner expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    IssueView PDF

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 30-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 19-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2292/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2292/2025 - Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between Lakshmamma and New India Insurance Company Limited for ₹4,10,000. The petitioner sought full compensation release citing substantial medical expenses and incurred loans. The court approved the compromise as legally enforceable, finding the petitioner competent and the settlement voluntary without coercion, and directed the insurance company to deposit the entire settlement amount to the petitioner expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case