LAKSHMAMMA vs SHIVU.P — 2292/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s.166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080025382025

Case disposedSub Stage

Filing Number

2292/2025

Filing Date

19-08-2025

Registration No

2292/2025

Registration Date

19-08-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section U/s.166

Petitioner(s)

LAKSHMAMMA

Adv. V.B.GIRISH

Respondent(s)

SHIVU.P

THE DIVISIONAL BRANCH MANAGER, NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-02-2026

A.D.R.

11-12-2025

OBJECTIONS

06-11-2025

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

30-08-2025

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Case 2292/2025 - Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between Lakshmamma and New India Insurance Company Limited for ₹4,10,000. The petitioner sought full compensation release citing substantial medical expenses and incurred loans. The court approved the compromise as legally enforceable, finding the petitioner competent and the settlement voluntary without coercion, and directed the insurance company to deposit the entire settlement amount to the petitioner expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

11-02-2026
Issue
casestatus.in Summary

Case 2292/2025 - Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between Lakshmamma and New India Insurance Company Limited for ₹4,10,000. The petitioner sought full compensation release citing substantial medical expenses and incurred loans. The court approved the compromise as legally enforceable, finding the petitioner competent and the settlement voluntary without coercion, and directed the insurance company to deposit the entire settlement amount to the petitioner expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case