RAVI KUMAR.S.J vs G.S.NIKHIL — 2288/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080025342025

Filing Number

2288/2025

Filing Date

19-Aug-2025

Registration No

2288/2025

Registration Date

19-Aug-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KUMAR.S.J

    Adv. K.A.POOVANNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.G.S.NIKHIL

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Ravi Kumar S.J. and respondents G.S. Nikhil and United India General Insurance Company Ltd. for ₹19,43,630. The court found the compromise was voluntarily agreed upon by competent parties without coercion, and ordered the insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount to the petitioner without delay, noting the petitioner's medical expenses and injuries justified releasing the entire amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 30-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 19-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2288/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Ravi Kumar S.J. and respondents G.S. Nikhil and United India General Insurance Company Ltd. for ₹19,43,630. The court found the compromise was voluntarily agreed upon by competent parties without coercion, and ordered the insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount to the petitioner without delay, noting the petitioner's medical expenses and injuries justified releasing the entire amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case