JEEVARAJU S vs MANU KUMAR K N — 2188/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT on 17th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080025212025
e-Filing Number
06-08-2025
Filing Number
2188/2025
Filing Date
07-Aug-2025
Registration No
2188/2025
Registration Date
07-Aug-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JEEVARAJU S
Adv. RACHANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANU KUMAR K N
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, CHOLA MANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 2188/2025 Summary: The court accepted a joint settlement memo wherein petitioner Jeevaraju S compromised his claim against respondents Manu Kumar K N and Chola Mandalam General Insurance Company Ltd for ₹6,50,000. The court verified the compromise was voluntary and legally enforceable. The insurance company was directed to deposit the full amount without delay, as the petitioner incurred substantial medical expenses and loans for injury-related treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
16-Mar-2026
Appearance Of Party
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
05-Feb-2026
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Dec-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Nov-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
30-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2188/2025
Case 2188/2025 Summary: The court accepted a joint settlement memo wherein petitioner Jeevaraju S compromised his claim against respondents Manu Kumar K N and Chola Mandalam General Insurance Company Ltd for ₹6,50,000. The court verified the compromise was voluntary and legally enforceable. The insurance company was directed to deposit the full amount without delay, as the petitioner incurred substantial medical expenses and loans for injury-related treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts