MAMATHA N H vs THE PROPRIETOR, M/S B.G.GRANITES — 2277/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080025012025

e-Filing Number

14-08-2025

Filing Number

2277/2025

Filing Date

16-Aug-2025

Registration No

2277/2025

Registration Date

18-Aug-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAMATHA N H

    Adv. H R MAHADEVA PRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE PROPRIETOR, M/S B.G.GRANITES

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Mamatha N H and respondents M/S B.G.Granites and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company for ₹4,10,000, disposing of the petition. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount to the petitioner, finding the settlement legally enforceable and considering her medical expenses and injury severity warranted releasing the entire compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 23-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2277/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Mamatha N H and respondents M/S B.G.Granites and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company for ₹4,10,000, disposing of the petition. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount to the petitioner, finding the settlement legally enforceable and considering her medical expenses and injury severity warranted releasing the entire compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case