SELVAM.S vs SURESH — 2219/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080024272025

Filing Number

2219/2025

Filing Date

11-Aug-2025

Registration No

2219/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SELVAM.S

    Adv. K.A.POOVANNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESH

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 2219/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Selvam.S and respondents Suresh and United India General Insurance Company Ltd. for ₹15,99,390. The court approved the joint memo of compromise, finding the settlement terms legally enforceable and the petitioner competent to receive the full amount. The insurance company was directed to deposit the compensation without unreasonable delay, with the entire amount released to the petitioner considering his substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 27-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 20-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2219/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2219/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Selvam.S and respondents Suresh and United India General Insurance Company Ltd. for ₹15,99,390. The court approved the joint memo of compromise, finding the settlement terms legally enforceable and the petitioner competent to receive the full amount. The insurance company was directed to deposit the compensation without unreasonable delay, with the entire amount released to the petitioner considering his substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case