ANUPAMA vs ANANDA.P — 2218/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080024262025

Filing Number

2218/2025

Filing Date

11-Aug-2025

Registration No

2218/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUPAMA

    Adv. K.A.POOVANNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANANDA.P

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Anupama and respondent New India Assurance Company Ltd for ₹4,10,000, disposing of the compensation dispute. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without delay, finding the settlement voluntary, the parties competent, and the amount appropriate given the petitioner's medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    IssueView PDF

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 31-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2218/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Anupama and respondent New India Assurance Company Ltd for ₹4,10,000, disposing of the compensation dispute. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without delay, finding the settlement voluntary, the parties competent, and the amount appropriate given the petitioner's medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case