SIDDANAYAKA vs MACHAIAH — 2118/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080023622025

Filing Number

2118/2025

Filing Date

31-Jul-2025

Registration No

2118/2025

Registration Date

01-Aug-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIDDANAYAKA

    Adv. K.SHANKARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MACHAIAH

  2. 2.N.BALAJI

  3. 3.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 2118/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Siddanayaka and respondents (Machaiah, N. Balaji, and Tata AIG General Insurance) for ₹6,45,000. The court found the compromise voluntary and legally enforceable, and directed Tata AIG to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without delay, considering his medical expenses, loan obligations, and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 07-Jan-2026

    IssueView PDF

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 31-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2118/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2118/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Siddanayaka and respondents (Machaiah, N. Balaji, and Tata AIG General Insurance) for ₹6,45,000. The court found the compromise voluntary and legally enforceable, and directed Tata AIG to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without delay, considering his medical expenses, loan obligations, and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case